https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293441 Section 100 CPC requires the High Court, in second appeal, to formulate a substantial question of law before disturbing concurrent findings of fact; reversal without doing so is procedurally unsustainable. In disputes with ex-licensees, a suit for mandatory injunction may remain maintainable after termination of the licence if filed with reasonable promptitude and the delay is explained; the issue depends on the facts and pleadings, and an unpleaded objection raised for the first time in second appeal will not ordinarily defeat the claim. The judgment also notes that a delayed, unexplained approach may instead call for a possession suit. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293441 Section 100 CPC requires the High Court, in second appeal, to formulate a substantial question of law before disturbing concurrent findings of fact; reversal without doing so is procedurally unsustainable. In disputes with ex-licensees, a suit for mandatory injunction may remain maintainable after termination of the licence if filed with reasonable promptitude and the delay is explained; the issue depends on the facts and pleadings, and an unpleaded objection raised for the first time in second appeal will not ordinarily defeat the claim. The judgment also notes that a delayed, unexplained approach may instead call for a possession suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293441