<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 431 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403939</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided with an opportunity to be heard. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remitting the matter back for reconsideration after affording a proper hearing to the parties. The Court noted that any pending applications did not survive for further consideration in light of the writ petition&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 431 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403939</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided with an opportunity to be heard. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remitting the matter back for reconsideration after affording a proper hearing to the parties. The Court noted that any pending applications did not survive for further consideration in light of the writ petition&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>