<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24602</link>
    <description>Customary hospitality spending on soft drinks, snacks and simple meals for customers and suppliers was treated as ordinary business expenditure, not entertainment expense, so it remained deductible and was not hit by section 37(2B). Surtax liability, however, was regarded as a tax on profits and gains and therefore fell within the prohibition in section 40(a)(ii), making it nondeductible as business expenditure. The reference was disposed of by allowing the hospitality deduction while upholding disallowance of the surtax claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 6 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24602</link>
      <description>Customary hospitality spending on soft drinks, snacks and simple meals for customers and suppliers was treated as ordinary business expenditure, not entertainment expense, so it remained deductible and was not hit by section 37(2B). Surtax liability, however, was regarded as a tax on profits and gains and therefore fell within the prohibition in section 40(a)(ii), making it nondeductible as business expenditure. The reference was disposed of by allowing the hospitality deduction while upholding disallowance of the surtax claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>