https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293431 The court upheld the legitimacy of the order directing the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) investigation, emphasizing the court's authority to direct investigations while dealing with contempt petitions. The court modified the order to ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, by directing communication to the Central Government for examination and potential direction to SFIO. The investigation would proceed following due process, with both parties given an opportunity to be heard. The Letters Patent Appeals were disposed of, with parties bearing their own costs. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:08:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293431 The court upheld the legitimacy of the order directing the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) investigation, emphasizing the court's authority to direct investigations while dealing with contempt petitions. The court modified the order to ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, by directing communication to the Central Government for examination and potential direction to SFIO. The investigation would proceed following due process, with both parties given an opportunity to be heard. The Letters Patent Appeals were disposed of, with parties bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293431