<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1775 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293421</link>
    <description>The case involved issues such as deletion of addition on account of short-term capital gain, allowance of expenses towards levelling and developing cost, sharing ratio in the surplus on sale of capital asset, application of section 50C in property sale, and deletion of addition on account of undisclosed investment. The Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) in favor of the assessee, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals by both the department and the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1775 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293421</link>
      <description>The case involved issues such as deletion of addition on account of short-term capital gain, allowance of expenses towards levelling and developing cost, sharing ratio in the surplus on sale of capital asset, application of section 50C in property sale, and deletion of addition on account of undisclosed investment. The Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) in favor of the assessee, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals by both the department and the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>