<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 987 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293417</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench depends on whether at least part of the cause of action arises within the areas assigned to it under Clause 14 of the U.P. High Court (Amalgamation) Order, 1948. A writ petition cannot be validly filed at Lucknow merely because an impleaded authority is stationed there if the impugned order and underlying cause of action lie outside that territorial limit; such matters belong, if at all, before Allahabad. The registry is required to scrutinise territorial jurisdiction at filing, verify the actual cause of action, and take administrative steps to prevent artificial creation of jurisdiction and wrongly instituted matters at Lucknow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 987 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293417</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction of the Lucknow Bench depends on whether at least part of the cause of action arises within the areas assigned to it under Clause 14 of the U.P. High Court (Amalgamation) Order, 1948. A writ petition cannot be validly filed at Lucknow merely because an impleaded authority is stationed there if the impugned order and underlying cause of action lie outside that territorial limit; such matters belong, if at all, before Allahabad. The registry is required to scrutinise territorial jurisdiction at filing, verify the actual cause of action, and take administrative steps to prevent artificial creation of jurisdiction and wrongly instituted matters at Lucknow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>