<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 712 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the depreciation on roads as buildings in accordance with amended schedules. The alternative claim for expenditure as revenue was rejected, and the provision for doubtful debts disallowed, aligning with High Court precedent. The Assessee&#039;s contentions were partially upheld, with instructions to permit depreciation on roads as buildings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 712 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the depreciation on roads as buildings in accordance with amended schedules. The alternative claim for expenditure as revenue was rejected, and the provision for doubtful debts disallowed, aligning with High Court precedent. The Assessee&#039;s contentions were partially upheld, with instructions to permit depreciation on roads as buildings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>