<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 376 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403884</link>
    <description>Bail granted to an accused may be cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC where the order is passed by misreading Section 19 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and by ignoring material facts. The High Court noted that the court below relied on bills and payment records but failed to examine whether the drugs were purchased from a licensed manufacturer, distributor, or dealer, and overlooked allegations that the drugs were spurious, bore identical strip codes, and that the main accused remained at large. On that basis, the bail order was treated as having been made on an incorrect statutory and factual foundation, and the bail cancellation application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 376 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403884</link>
      <description>Bail granted to an accused may be cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC where the order is passed by misreading Section 19 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and by ignoring material facts. The High Court noted that the court below relied on bills and payment records but failed to examine whether the drugs were purchased from a licensed manufacturer, distributor, or dealer, and overlooked allegations that the drugs were spurious, bore identical strip codes, and that the main accused remained at large. On that basis, the bail order was treated as having been made on an incorrect statutory and factual foundation, and the bail cancellation application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>