https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403879 The court directed the writ petitioners to deposit Rs. 50 lakh in a nationalized bank to remove goods within 30 days. The court reserved final adjudication on the Port's claim, with interest payable if the claim was exaggerated. The writ petitioners were required to issue an undertaking for excess charges, but removal of goods was not contingent upon this. The judgment left open points for final hearing, granting the Port the right to seek appropriation of up to 75% of the deposit, subject to the final order. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403879 The court directed the writ petitioners to deposit Rs. 50 lakh in a nationalized bank to remove goods within 30 days. The court reserved final adjudication on the Port's claim, with interest payable if the claim was exaggerated. The writ petitioners were required to issue an undertaking for excess charges, but removal of goods was not contingent upon this. The judgment left open points for final hearing, granting the Port the right to seek appropriation of up to 75% of the deposit, subject to the final order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403879