<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 347 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty on cash advances and the difference in stock valuation but upheld the penalty on the cash amount found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty under Section 271AAB is discretionary and must be based on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 347 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty on cash advances and the difference in stock valuation but upheld the penalty on the cash amount found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty under Section 271AAB is discretionary and must be based on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>