<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1579 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Appellant, determining that nylon ropes are essential components of the paper machine and qualify as capital goods for availing Cenvat credit. The decision emphasized the critical role of nylon ropes in facilitating the movement of paper tail in the paper manufacturing process, supported by evidence including a certificate from a Chartered Engineer and visual demonstrations of their importance in the machine&#039;s operation. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of substantial evidence from the Department contradicting the essentiality of nylon ropes, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1579 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Appellant, determining that nylon ropes are essential components of the paper machine and qualify as capital goods for availing Cenvat credit. The decision emphasized the critical role of nylon ropes in facilitating the movement of paper tail in the paper manufacturing process, supported by evidence including a certificate from a Chartered Engineer and visual demonstrations of their importance in the machine&#039;s operation. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of substantial evidence from the Department contradicting the essentiality of nylon ropes, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>