<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1437 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293410</link>
    <description>The Corporation undertook to extend PAP benefits to the petitioner in terms of the stated policy guidelines, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The Court also granted the petitioner 15 days to file an appeal against any adverse order, preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate remedy while the undertaking governed the immediate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1437 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293410</link>
      <description>The Corporation undertook to extend PAP benefits to the petitioner in terms of the stated policy guidelines, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The Court also granted the petitioner 15 days to file an appeal against any adverse order, preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate remedy while the undertaking governed the immediate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>