<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1855 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293413</link>
    <description>A court-directed further inquiry into Judge Loya&#039;s death was rejected because the contemporaneous record consistently showed chest pain, hospital treatment, and death from coronary artery insufficiency. The inquiry under Section 174 CrPC is confined to ascertaining the apparent cause of death, and an inquest report is not substantive evidence. The Court found no material to discredit the official record or the statements of the accompanying judges, and refused to rely on newspaper reports or collateral allegations to create suspicion. Cross-examination of persons examined in the discreet inquiry was also declined as not available as of right. No reasonable suspicion of an unnatural death was made out, so no further inquiry was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1855 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293413</link>
      <description>A court-directed further inquiry into Judge Loya&#039;s death was rejected because the contemporaneous record consistently showed chest pain, hospital treatment, and death from coronary artery insufficiency. The inquiry under Section 174 CrPC is confined to ascertaining the apparent cause of death, and an inquest report is not substantive evidence. The Court found no material to discredit the official record or the statements of the accompanying judges, and refused to rely on newspaper reports or collateral allegations to create suspicion. Cross-examination of persons examined in the discreet inquiry was also declined as not available as of right. No reasonable suspicion of an unnatural death was made out, so no further inquiry was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>