<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24586</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application u/s 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for condonation of delay in filing the application. The court found that the applicant did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in filing the application and failed to provide clear and explicit facts regarding the steps taken during the delay period. As the application was barred by limitation, it was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24586</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application u/s 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for condonation of delay in filing the application. The court found that the applicant did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in filing the application and failed to provide clear and explicit facts regarding the steps taken during the delay period. As the application was barred by limitation, it was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their own costs in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>