<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 321 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403829</link>
    <description>An employer&#039;s TDS obligation under section 192 was assessed on the basis of a bona fide estimate of salary income, and cash medical benefit paid on employee declarations was not treated as creating default where the estimate was honest and supported by prior approval. The extended seven-year limitation for orders under section 201 was held prospective, so earlier orders that had already become time barred under the two-year regime could not be revived. The jurisdictional challenge failed for want of prior objection and proof of lack of authority. The issue concerning payment to Sodexo SVC India Pvt. Ltd. for the later year was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 321 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403829</link>
      <description>An employer&#039;s TDS obligation under section 192 was assessed on the basis of a bona fide estimate of salary income, and cash medical benefit paid on employee declarations was not treated as creating default where the estimate was honest and supported by prior approval. The extended seven-year limitation for orders under section 201 was held prospective, so earlier orders that had already become time barred under the two-year regime could not be revived. The jurisdictional challenge failed for want of prior objection and proof of lack of authority. The issue concerning payment to Sodexo SVC India Pvt. Ltd. for the later year was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>