<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of income under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was unjustified as the transaction was between relatives, exempting it from tax. Additionally, Section 50C was deemed inapplicable to the purchaser. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the income addition and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:26:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the addition of income under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) was unjustified as the transaction was between relatives, exempting it from tax. Additionally, Section 50C was deemed inapplicable to the purchaser. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the income addition and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>