https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403816 The Tribunal considered an urgent request for interim protection in a company petition alleging oppressive conduct and unilateral corporate action affecting a director-shareholder. It noted that earlier ex parte directions had already required prior notice before any move to remove the applicant as director and compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. As the respondents had not appeared, the Tribunal declined to issue further ex parte relief at that stage, but granted limited protection by restraining the respondents from compelling acceptance of the rights issue until further orders. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:15:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403816 The Tribunal considered an urgent request for interim protection in a company petition alleging oppressive conduct and unilateral corporate action affecting a director-shareholder. It noted that earlier ex parte directions had already required prior notice before any move to remove the applicant as director and compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. As the respondents had not appeared, the Tribunal declined to issue further ex parte relief at that stage, but granted limited protection by restraining the respondents from compelling acceptance of the rights issue until further orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403816