https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403812 Writ jurisdiction was held unsuitable for a mandamus seeking criminal or forensic investigation into disputed property transactions where rival title claims and alleged financial improprieties were already subject to a civil suit. The Court treated the matter as dependent on contested facts requiring trial, evidence and cross-examination, and refused to conduct a parallel or roving enquiry on the basis of suspicion. It also noted that writ proceedings cannot be used as a private investigative forum or to collect material for leverage in civil litigation. The petition was therefore not maintainable on the facts presented and was dismissed. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403812 Writ jurisdiction was held unsuitable for a mandamus seeking criminal or forensic investigation into disputed property transactions where rival title claims and alleged financial improprieties were already subject to a civil suit. The Court treated the matter as dependent on contested facts requiring trial, evidence and cross-examination, and refused to conduct a parallel or roving enquiry on the basis of suspicion. It also noted that writ proceedings cannot be used as a private investigative forum or to collect material for leverage in civil litigation. The petition was therefore not maintainable on the facts presented and was dismissed. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403812