<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 302 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403810</link>
    <description>A moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevents the institution or continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor during the corporate insolvency resolution process. Because insolvency proceedings were admitted and the moratorium subsisted, the pending writ petition could not be pursued at that stage and was disposed of as not entertainable. The legal effect is that further adjudication must be deferred while the moratorium remains in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 302 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403810</link>
      <description>A moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevents the institution or continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor during the corporate insolvency resolution process. Because insolvency proceedings were admitted and the moratorium subsisted, the pending writ petition could not be pursued at that stage and was disposed of as not entertainable. The legal effect is that further adjudication must be deferred while the moratorium remains in force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>