<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1827 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that both the R&amp;amp;D expenses and the commitment charges for canceling the foreign currency cover were revenue expenditures allowable under the relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the business purpose and nature of the expenses, aligning with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1827 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that both the R&amp;amp;D expenses and the commitment charges for canceling the foreign currency cover were revenue expenditures allowable under the relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the business purpose and nature of the expenses, aligning with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>