<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal&#039;s Extension of Stay Beyond 185 Days u/s 254(2A) Challenged; Lacks Authority Without Hearing or Dated Order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56635</link>
    <description>Validity of order of Tribunal extending the stay beyond a period of 185 days - delay in disposing of the appeal is attributable to the assessee - Scope of Section 254(2A) - We are at a loss to understand as to how the Tribunal exercised its power in issuing a suo motu Corrigendum, that too by an undated order without hearing the Revenue or the Assessing Officer. - Tribunal, while issuing directions to the Departmental representative, not to exercise its jurisdiction against the assessee, should be traceable to the statutory provisions. We find that no such power has been conferred on the Tribunal under Section 254 of the Act. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:08:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:08:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal&#039;s Extension of Stay Beyond 185 Days u/s 254(2A) Challenged; Lacks Authority Without Hearing or Dated Order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56635</link>
      <description>Validity of order of Tribunal extending the stay beyond a period of 185 days - delay in disposing of the appeal is attributable to the assessee - Scope of Section 254(2A) - We are at a loss to understand as to how the Tribunal exercised its power in issuing a suo motu Corrigendum, that too by an undated order without hearing the Revenue or the Assessing Officer. - Tribunal, while issuing directions to the Departmental representative, not to exercise its jurisdiction against the assessee, should be traceable to the statutory provisions. We find that no such power has been conferred on the Tribunal under Section 254 of the Act. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:08:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>