<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s actions in extending the stay and issuing directions to the Revenue were deemed beyond its jurisdiction and not in compliance with Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act. The substantial questions of law favored the Revenue. However, the court chose not to intervene as the main appeal had already been heard and reserved for orders, rendering the matter academic. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 283 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s actions in extending the stay and issuing directions to the Revenue were deemed beyond its jurisdiction and not in compliance with Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act. The substantial questions of law favored the Revenue. However, the court chose not to intervene as the main appeal had already been heard and reserved for orders, rendering the matter academic. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>