<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403755</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the first respondent-assessee. It determined that the transaction did not constitute an inter-state sale under the CST Act as the goods did not move from Tamil Nadu to the ultimate buyers in other states, and no transfer of title occurred. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the decision without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403755</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the first respondent-assessee. It determined that the transaction did not constitute an inter-state sale under the CST Act as the goods did not move from Tamil Nadu to the ultimate buyers in other states, and no transfer of title occurred. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order and dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the decision without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>