<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 637 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293378</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the correctness of rejecting claims for leave travel allowance and conveyance allowance, setting aside tax and interest for short deduction of tax at source, and verifying expenses for leave travel allowance exemption based on employee declarations. Citing legal precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:23:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 637 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293378</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the correctness of rejecting claims for leave travel allowance and conveyance allowance, setting aside tax and interest for short deduction of tax at source, and verifying expenses for leave travel allowance exemption based on employee declarations. Citing legal precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>