<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1791 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of expenditure under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2006-07. It emphasized the need for proper authorization of appeals based on tax effect and specified grounds by the Commissioner, stressing the importance of recording justifiable reasons for appeals and adherence to CBDT Circulars to avoid routine filing of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 06:23:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1791 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of expenditure under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2006-07. It emphasized the need for proper authorization of appeals based on tax effect and specified grounds by the Commissioner, stressing the importance of recording justifiable reasons for appeals and adherence to CBDT Circulars to avoid routine filing of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>