<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 240 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403748</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petition by directing respondent No.2 to address and decide the objections raised by the petitioner before proceeding on the show cause notice. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the jurisdiction of the proper officer and emphasized respondent No.2&#039;s obligation to act in accordance with the law in considering the objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 240 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403748</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petition by directing respondent No.2 to address and decide the objections raised by the petitioner before proceeding on the show cause notice. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the jurisdiction of the proper officer and emphasized respondent No.2&#039;s obligation to act in accordance with the law in considering the objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>