<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 101 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24567</link>
    <description>The Court determined that the perquisite value of a free residence provided by one employer to an assessee earning remuneration from multiple employers should be based on the total salary received from all employers, not just the employer providing the accommodation. The judgment upheld the assessee&#039;s argument, interpreting the relevant tax rules to calculate the perquisite value in line with the total salary received by the employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:57:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 101 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24567</link>
      <description>The Court determined that the perquisite value of a free residence provided by one employer to an assessee earning remuneration from multiple employers should be based on the total salary received from all employers, not just the employer providing the accommodation. The judgment upheld the assessee&#039;s argument, interpreting the relevant tax rules to calculate the perquisite value in line with the total salary received by the employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>