<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 100 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24565</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions for the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69, and 1969-70, emphasizing substantial compliance with the worker employment requirements under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was ruled that employing an average of 10 workers satisfied the requirement, and each case should be evaluated individually for substantial compliance. Previous judgments supported this interpretation, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee regarding the first questions and an unfavorable outcome for the second questions in the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 100 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24565</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions for the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69, and 1969-70, emphasizing substantial compliance with the worker employment requirements under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was ruled that employing an average of 10 workers satisfied the requirement, and each case should be evaluated individually for substantial compliance. Previous judgments supported this interpretation, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee regarding the first questions and an unfavorable outcome for the second questions in the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>