<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 209 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403717</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No.3 to consider the writ petition as a representation for the refund claim of INR 2,50,00,000, decide promptly in accordance with the law, and potentially include interest payment on the principal amount. The court emphasized fair consideration of evidence and adherence to legal provisions in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 209 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403717</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No.3 to consider the writ petition as a representation for the refund claim of INR 2,50,00,000, decide promptly in accordance with the law, and potentially include interest payment on the principal amount. The court emphasized fair consideration of evidence and adherence to legal provisions in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>