<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 200 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403708</link>
    <description>Reassessment is valid only where the assessing authority first records a bona fide reason to believe, based on relevant material, that turnover has escaped assessment under the correct statute. That belief must have a rational nexus with the record and cannot rest on extraneous or mistaken premises. Where the original assessment does not show a formed opinion, a change-of-opinion objection may not succeed; however, the reopening still fails if the recorded basis is factually incorrect or unsupported by independent material. The text states that a notice founded on proceedings under a different statutory regime was extraneous and insufficient to confer jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 200 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403708</link>
      <description>Reassessment is valid only where the assessing authority first records a bona fide reason to believe, based on relevant material, that turnover has escaped assessment under the correct statute. That belief must have a rational nexus with the record and cannot rest on extraneous or mistaken premises. Where the original assessment does not show a formed opinion, a change-of-opinion objection may not succeed; however, the reopening still fails if the recorded basis is factually incorrect or unsupported by independent material. The text states that a notice founded on proceedings under a different statutory regime was extraneous and insufficient to confer jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>