https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293341 The Privy Council held that the personal remedy sought against the mortgagor was time-barred under the Limitation Act of 1871, despite the mortgage remaining enforceable against the mortgaged property. They clarified that different limitation periods applied to distinct claims, affirming the High Court's decision and rejecting the District Court's interpretation. The Council emphasized the need to differentiate between remedies sought against the property and the person of the defendant. The appeal was decided in favor of enforcing the mortgage against the property while barring the personal remedy against the mortgagor. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 1884 00:00:00 +0521 Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293341 The Privy Council held that the personal remedy sought against the mortgagor was time-barred under the Limitation Act of 1871, despite the mortgage remaining enforceable against the mortgaged property. They clarified that different limitation periods applied to distinct claims, affirming the High Court's decision and rejecting the District Court's interpretation. The Council emphasized the need to differentiate between remedies sought against the property and the person of the defendant. The appeal was decided in favor of enforcing the mortgage against the property while barring the personal remedy against the mortgagor. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 1884 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293341