<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293340</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for a writ of Mandamus directing the issuance of a license under the West Bengal Rice Mills Control Order, 1949. The petitioner, a husking mill proprietor, failed to disclose prosecution and conviction for contravention of the Control Order, leading to the application&#039;s failure. Additionally, the petition lacked proper verification and challenged the reasonableness of the licensing system, which the court upheld as necessary for government regulation in the public interest. The judgment emphasized the importance of full disclosure, compliance with legal requirements, and the need for absolute discretion in a reasonable licensing system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 12:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (7) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293340</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for a writ of Mandamus directing the issuance of a license under the West Bengal Rice Mills Control Order, 1949. The petitioner, a husking mill proprietor, failed to disclose prosecution and conviction for contravention of the Control Order, leading to the application&#039;s failure. Additionally, the petition lacked proper verification and challenged the reasonableness of the licensing system, which the court upheld as necessary for government regulation in the public interest. The judgment emphasized the importance of full disclosure, compliance with legal requirements, and the need for absolute discretion in a reasonable licensing system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>