<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293338</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court, confirming that the termination orders issued by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) were invalid. The Court emphasized that the termination did not comply with the procedural requirements outlined in Clause 10 of the Life Insurance Corporation Field Officers&#039; Order, 1957. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, and costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293338</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court, confirming that the termination orders issued by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) were invalid. The Court emphasized that the termination did not comply with the procedural requirements outlined in Clause 10 of the Life Insurance Corporation Field Officers&#039; Order, 1957. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, and costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>