<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293337</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay criticized the food inspector for flawed procedures in obtaining and sealing food samples, deeming the panchanama as unreliable. The court emphasized the need for accurate documentation reflecting actual events witnessed by the panchas, rather than a pre-determined narrative. It highlighted that events during sample collection cannot be standardized, rendering a pre-filled panchanama worthless.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 241 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293337</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay criticized the food inspector for flawed procedures in obtaining and sealing food samples, deeming the panchanama as unreliable. The court emphasized the need for accurate documentation reflecting actual events witnessed by the panchas, rather than a pre-determined narrative. It highlighted that events during sample collection cannot be standardized, rendering a pre-filled panchanama worthless.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>