https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403700 The AP HC disposed of a writ petition challenging a works contract classification order at the admission stage. The court declined to entertain the petition under Article 226, finding that an alternative statutory remedy of appeal to the Joint Commissioner was available under Section 107 of the Act. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits, directing the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy within the prescribed three-month limitation period from the date of the impugned order. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403700 The AP HC disposed of a writ petition challenging a works contract classification order at the admission stage. The court declined to entertain the petition under Article 226, finding that an alternative statutory remedy of appeal to the Joint Commissioner was available under Section 107 of the Act. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits, directing the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy within the prescribed three-month limitation period from the date of the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403700