<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403694</link>
    <description>The court held that the failure to pass a draft assessment order in a case involving Transfer Pricing issues was a substantial error. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of passing a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act. Due to the procedural irregularity, the assessment order was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed, resulting in the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403694</link>
      <description>The court held that the failure to pass a draft assessment order in a case involving Transfer Pricing issues was a substantial error. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of passing a draft assessment order under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act. Due to the procedural irregularity, the assessment order was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed, resulting in the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>