<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 180 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403688</link>
    <description>The ITAT Allahabad dismissed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking correction of a mistake apparent from records in the appellate order dated 21.12.2017. The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer based on the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the creditworthiness of the lender and genuineness of the transaction, in accordance with Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions was reversed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with statutory requirements. The tribunal&#039;s decision was final, with no identified mistakes in the appellate order warranting correction under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 180 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403688</link>
      <description>The ITAT Allahabad dismissed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking correction of a mistake apparent from records in the appellate order dated 21.12.2017. The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer based on the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the creditworthiness of the lender and genuineness of the transaction, in accordance with Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions was reversed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with statutory requirements. The tribunal&#039;s decision was final, with no identified mistakes in the appellate order warranting correction under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>