<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 172 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material and recorded incorrect facts. The addition of Rs. 11,49,060/- under section 69 was also deemed baseless and unsupported by evidence, leading to its deletion. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 172 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the Assessing Officer lacked tangible material and recorded incorrect facts. The addition of Rs. 11,49,060/- under section 69 was also deemed baseless and unsupported by evidence, leading to its deletion. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>