<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 165 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impleadment of the statutory auditor as a necessary party in the Company Petition, emphasizing fair adjudication and judicial propriety by retaining the auditor in the party array for effective resolution of the dispute. The application to remove the auditor was dismissed, affirming the decision to include the auditor as the Additional 5th Respondent in the Company Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 165 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impleadment of the statutory auditor as a necessary party in the Company Petition, emphasizing fair adjudication and judicial propriety by retaining the auditor in the party array for effective resolution of the dispute. The application to remove the auditor was dismissed, affirming the decision to include the auditor as the Additional 5th Respondent in the Company Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>