<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 159 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of the refund claim regarding the service not considered an input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the Revenue erred in raising the credit availment issue during the refund claim consideration, noting that the dispute was about the refund claim itself. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 159 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of the refund claim regarding the service not considered an input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the Revenue erred in raising the credit availment issue during the refund claim consideration, noting that the dispute was about the refund claim itself. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>