<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the service tax demand on late payment surcharge, meter rent, and supervision charges as they were considered exempt bundled services related to electricity transmission and distribution. However, the penalty on lease rent was confirmed. The extended period of limitation issue was not extensively discussed, focusing primarily on the taxability of the charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the service tax demand on late payment surcharge, meter rent, and supervision charges as they were considered exempt bundled services related to electricity transmission and distribution. However, the penalty on lease rent was confirmed. The extended period of limitation issue was not extensively discussed, focusing primarily on the taxability of the charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>