<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 154 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403662</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Orders-in-Original and directed the Authority to issue a show cause notice, conduct a hearing, and pass an order of adjudication within specified timelines. The judgment emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements, particularly providing an opportunity for the petitioner to be heard before adjudication, as mandated by Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 154 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403662</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Orders-in-Original and directed the Authority to issue a show cause notice, conduct a hearing, and pass an order of adjudication within specified timelines. The judgment emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements, particularly providing an opportunity for the petitioner to be heard before adjudication, as mandated by Section 33A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>