<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403659</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the cheques issued were for a legally enforceable debt. The court dismissed the revision petition, emphasizing the presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Act and the lack of evidence to rebut it. The petitioner&#039;s challenges regarding the non-production of books of accounts by the respondent were deemed insufficient to overturn the conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403659</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the cheques issued were for a legally enforceable debt. The court dismissed the revision petition, emphasizing the presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Act and the lack of evidence to rebut it. The petitioner&#039;s challenges regarding the non-production of books of accounts by the respondent were deemed insufficient to overturn the conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>