<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. It upheld the deletion of franchisee fees addition, allowed depreciation claims despite prior capital expenditure, and supported the set off and carry forward of losses. The Tribunal relied on precedent and jurisdictional High Court rulings to substantiate its conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. It upheld the deletion of franchisee fees addition, allowed depreciation claims despite prior capital expenditure, and supported the set off and carry forward of losses. The Tribunal relied on precedent and jurisdictional High Court rulings to substantiate its conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>