https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293327 Section 169 of the Companies Act does not bar the court that made an ex parte payment order from entertaining an application to set it aside; rehearing is appellate in character but ex parte orders or nullities remain dischargeable by the original court. A payment order under section 150 is treated as an order (appealable as from an order) and not as a decree for Limitation Act purposes, so Article 164 is inapplicable. In absence of company law procedure, the Civil Procedure Code regime and the court's inherent powers apply; Order IX procedure (read mutatis mutandis) governs and the Limitation Act provision for CPC applications may apply. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:05:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293327 Section 169 of the Companies Act does not bar the court that made an ex parte payment order from entertaining an application to set it aside; rehearing is appellate in character but ex parte orders or nullities remain dischargeable by the original court. A payment order under section 150 is treated as an order (appealable as from an order) and not as a decree for Limitation Act purposes, so Article 164 is inapplicable. In absence of company law procedure, the Civil Procedure Code regime and the court's inherent powers apply; Order IX procedure (read mutatis mutandis) governs and the Limitation Act provision for CPC applications may apply. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Feb 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293327