<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1928 (7) TMI 5 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293321</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts&#039; judgments that the suit was barred by limitation. The plaintiff&#039;s claim of payments extending the limitation period was not substantiated, and her plea of waiver was inconsistent with her allegations of payment. The court relied on established legal principles and precedents to reach its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1928 (7) TMI 5 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293321</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts&#039; judgments that the suit was barred by limitation. The plaintiff&#039;s claim of payments extending the limitation period was not substantiated, and her plea of waiver was inconsistent with her allegations of payment. The court relied on established legal principles and precedents to reach its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>