<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (5) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293320</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the order allowing the amendment of the execution petition and the sale of the charged immovable properties without prior attachment. The judgment emphasized the executing court&#039;s discretion in allowing amendments and the enforceability of charges created by consent decrees in execution proceedings. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (5) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293320</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the order allowing the amendment of the execution petition and the sale of the charged immovable properties without prior attachment. The judgment emphasized the executing court&#039;s discretion in allowing amendments and the enforceability of charges created by consent decrees in execution proceedings. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>