https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293319 The court held that a consent decree including terms of a contract between the defendants was not executable as the executing court cannot enforce extraneous contracts included in the decree. It emphasized that a decree must conclusively determine the rights of the parties regarding the matters in controversy in the suit. The court dismissed the appeal and directed each party to bear its own costs, reiterating the principle that an executing court cannot enforce extraneous matters included in a decree by consent of parties. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:24:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293319 The court held that a consent decree including terms of a contract between the defendants was not executable as the executing court cannot enforce extraneous contracts included in the decree. It emphasized that a decree must conclusively determine the rights of the parties regarding the matters in controversy in the suit. The court dismissed the appeal and directed each party to bear its own costs, reiterating the principle that an executing court cannot enforce extraneous matters included in a decree by consent of parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293319