<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293318</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s award on wage scales, dearness allowance, adjustments, and gratuity, citing the company&#039;s financial stability. Modifications were made to dearness allowance, leave rules, and retirement age. The Court directed adjustments of interim relief and set the effective dates for the modifications. The retirement age was fixed at 58 years, with the option for extension. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293318</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s award on wage scales, dearness allowance, adjustments, and gratuity, citing the company&#039;s financial stability. Modifications were made to dearness allowance, leave rules, and retirement age. The Court directed adjustments of interim relief and set the effective dates for the modifications. The retirement age was fixed at 58 years, with the option for extension. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>