<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293310</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for amalgamation due to inadequacy of valuation methods, non-compliance with statutory requirements for explanatory statements, and procedural lapses under section 391. Gungaram Tea Co., Ltd. lacked express power to amalgamate with Carron Tea Co., Ltd., emphasizing the importance of transparency, proper valuation, and adherence to statutory procedures to protect shareholders&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293310</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for amalgamation due to inadequacy of valuation methods, non-compliance with statutory requirements for explanatory statements, and procedural lapses under section 391. Gungaram Tea Co., Ltd. lacked express power to amalgamate with Carron Tea Co., Ltd., emphasizing the importance of transparency, proper valuation, and adherence to statutory procedures to protect shareholders&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>